Parenting coordinators, or PCs, are an increasingly popular form of mediation for parents locked in high-conflict battles over custody rights (i.e. parents least likely to be going the online divorce route).
While the function, in theory, is commendable, many people feel outraged by the idea that a court-appointed mental health professional or lawyer, should be given the power to interpret court orders and essentially decide what is in the best interests of the child. To fully understand the debate over whether PCs are necessary, let’s look at the pros and cons.
First, The Pro Side.
Parenting coordinators are:
Next, The Con Side.
Parenting coordinators are not:
So How Do You Avoid Them?
Currently, only 10 states have passed laws on parenting coordination, so it’s not all that hard. But with 20 percent of the US already under its belt, the concept is becoming more popular. If you want to avoid the PC, then the best thing you can do is have a civil relationship with your child’s other parent. Work through your differences with regard to parenting decisions, family routines, and scheduling. Don’t let things escalate, and it will never get to the point you will need a PC.
But it’s worth noting that you can’t always control the behavior of the other parent, and should the situation call for it, a PC may not be such a bad idea. After all, one thing you wanted, even before learning how to file for divorce, was what was best for your child.